LINK: Michael Antony's Review of Reasonable Atheism by Aikin and Talisse

[This post was originally published on The Secular Outpost on November 8, 2011. It was republished here on November 9, 2021 with the date manually adjusted to reflect its original publication date. The link has also been updated to reflect its current location as of November 8, 2011.]

LINK: Mark Wynn's Review of The Non-Existence of God by Nicholas Everitt

[This post was originally published on The Secular Outpost on October 21, 2011. It was republished here on November 8, 2021 with the date manually adjusted to reflect its original publication date. The link was also updated to its current location.]

LINK

LINK: Kohl Reviews Wielenberg's God and the Reach of Reason

[This post was originally published on The Secular Outpost on October 19, 2011. It was republished here on November 8, 2021 with the date manually adjusted to reflect its original publication date. The link was also updated to its current location.]

LINK

LINK: Tim Mawson's Review of Divine Motivation Theory by Linda Zagzebski

[This post was originally published on The Secular Outpost on October 19, 2011. It was republished here on November 9, 2021 with the date manually adjusted to reflect its original publication date. The link was also updated to its current location.]

LINK

LINK: Schellenberg's Review of The Cambridge Companion to Atheism

[This post was originally published on The Secular Outpost on October 16, 2011. It was republished here on November 8, 2021 with the date manually adjusted to reflect its original publication date.]

J.L. Schellenberg is arguably one of the leading philosophers of religion in the world and, among other things, the philosopher who formulated the argument from divine hiddenness for atheism. Schellenberg reviewed The Cambridge Companion to Atheism (ed. Michael Martin) in the Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.

Here is the conclusion of Schellenberg's review:

I myself think that a good case for atheism (understood as disbelief of traditional theism) can be developed, but the arguments in this book leave one with the impression that the case is weaker than it is, and it must be said that the available arguments for theism are stronger than they are here suggested to be. Still, the student or nonspecialist will be able to take away from both the philosophical and the nonphilosophical discussions that this work contains a pretty good idea of which issues are important to the understanding and assessment of atheism, and should be stimulated — if only through disagreement — to think more carefully about those issues for herself. 

LINK

LINK: Michael Ruse: Little Value in New Harris Book

[This post was originally published on The Secular Outpost on October 6, 2011. It was republished here on November 7, 2021 with the date manually adjusted to reflect its original publication date. The link was also updated to its current location.]

"Poor scholarship, ad hominem attacks and an obsession with religion are not the hallmarks of a solid argument."

LINK