An Impossible (or Penrose) Triangle
The Aseity-vs-Temporal Argument
temporal theism =df. theism conjoined with the proposition, "God is necessarily temporal"
(1) If temporal theism is true, then God is a se. [Premise]
(2) If temporal theism is true, then God is temporal. [Premise]
(3) If God is a se, then God is self-existent, independent, and underived. [From the definition of a se]
(4) If God is timeless sans creation and temporal with creation, then God is not necessarily temporal.
(5) Therefore, it is impossible for God to be both a se and necessarily temporal. (from 3 and 4)
(6) Hence, it is impossible for temporal theism to be true. (from 1, 2, and 5)
To avoid any misunderstandings, I am merely sketching an argument, not defending it. I claim only that it is valid, not that it is sound.
No comments:
Post a Comment