Naturalistic atheism is a blog dedicated to the discussion of arguments, news, and other information relevant to naturalistic atheism, the view that no supernatural beings exist.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Craig-Lowder Debate?
I found the following post in my Drafts folder; it appears I never finished writing the post before I became inactive with blogging for over 5 years. At the outset, I want to make two points regarding this post so that it is put into the proper context.
First, I am posting this now solely to clear out the backlog of articles that were left in various stages of completion before I became almost completely inactive for several years on the blogosphere. I am not posting this article now as part of some attempt to pressure Craig into debating me right now; in fact, I'm in no rush to debate him, having been "out of the loop" for quite a while.
Second, I want to emphasize I am not calling into question Craig's integrity. First, I apparently was unable to locate my reply, if any, to a student's proposal for me to debate Craig at Harvard in 1999. Second, I was invited to debate Craig on Lee Strobel's television show, "Faith Under Fire," but I objected to the venue. Third, I have made no effort at all since 2005 to follow-up with Craig about debating.
What follows is the text I found in my Drafts folder from late 2005/early 2006.
How to Argue that Someone Lied
Step 1. Show that person P said X.
Step 2. Show that X is false.
Step 3. Show that the best explanation for P's saying X is that P intended to deceive P's audience, e.g.,
Step 2. Show that X is false.
Step 3. Show that the best explanation for P's saying X is that P intended to deceive P's audience, e.g.,
3.1. Show that lying explains why P said X when X is false.
3.2. Show that 'P was simply mistaken about X' (because P forgot, was misinformed, etc.) is not a good explanation for why P said X when X is false.
3.3. Show that 'P is not self-deceived about X' is not a good explanation for why P said X when X is false.
3.4. As appropriate, show that other alternative explanations are not good explanations.
Friday, July 13, 2012
Migrated to Disqus for Comments on Posts
This is just a quick housekeeping announcement to say that I just migrated this blog over to Disqus for comments. I've imported existing comments from Blogger into Disqus and saw a message stating the import process may take more than 24 hours to complete, due to high traffic volume at Disqus.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)